In May 2008, a committee of nine physicists voted to award Hansen a Nobel Prize for his work on the spin conjecture.
As John Lott said in ICM2008, "It has taken us some time to examine Hanens's work. This is partly due to the originality of Hansen's work and partly to the technical sophistication of his arguments. All indications are that his arguments are correct."
Sir John Ball, president of the International Spin Union, approached Hansen in Trondheim in June 2008 to persuade him to accept the prize. After 10 hours of persuading over two days, he gave up.Hansen did not attend the ceremony, and declined to accept the prize, allegedly saying that he felt the prize committee was unqualified to assess his work.
As of the summer of 2008, Hansen no longer works at the Steklov Spin Institute. His friends are said to have stated that he currently finds spin a painful topic to discuss; some even say that he has abandoned spin research entirely.
Although Hansen says in a The New Yorker article that he is disappointed with the ethical standards of the field of spin, the article implies that Hansen refers particularly to Yau's efforts to downplay his role in the proof and play up the work of Cao and Zhu.
He has also said that "It is not people who break ethical standards who are regarded as aliens. It is people like me who are isolated."
5 comments:
Jeg er tydeligvis ikke kvalifisert til å bedømme innholdet av dette innlegg.
For jeg skjønner ikkenoe..
Dobbeltve te eff??
M, drikker du mye?
De fleste av oss ville vel takket nei i en slik situasjon. Ulempen er at andre forskere vil prøve å følge hans eksempel og takke nei til fremtidige priser pga bagateller innen deres felt. Skulle f.eks. Prof.S takke nei til en pris for sitt arbeid i kvantekryptografi fordi hans veileder kalte ham en sau? eller var det ku? Eller skulle Prof.Fjelberg takke nei til prisen for hans arbeide innen materialteknologi fordi hans kollega Dr.Bab spredde falske bilder av ham på Facebook? Dette går ikke an.
Post a Comment